Thursday, May 16, 2013

Of Course a Cheese Store Has a Tiny Grater Business Card

Since printing its address and contact details on a slice of muenster cheese would probably do more harm than good for Bon Vivant, the Brazilian-based cheese shop hired ad agency JWT to come up with something better. And in every way possible, this miniature cheese grater business card is a much better idea.

So as not to also turn your wallet into a pile of shredded leather, the grater comes in a protective sleeve, which probably also helps to minimize the inevitable cheese smell from permeating your pocket. And that's also why the garlic growers of the world should just forget about trying a similar gimmick to promote their product.

[Stocklogos via Taxi]

Source: http://gizmodo.com/of-course-a-cheese-store-has-a-tiny-grater-business-car-505465406

rampart nick collins dave matthews ambien wwdc madden 13 cover dalai lama

The Importance Of Keeping Ernest

By Susan Vaughan Moshofsky for Brain, Child: The Magazine for Thinking Mothers

?Can I bring home Ernest, Mommy?? four-year-old Reed begged. ?For the summer?? Ernest, the preschool class turtle, for the whole summer. I loathe reptiles.

Reed clung like a barnacle when I dropped him off at preschool and melted down when I finally peeled him off. Keeping the turtle might ease Reed?s re-entry to school next fall. Plus, he?d earn celebrity status. I nodded.

?Here are his worms,? Teacher Lynn handed me a small plastic tub with tiny holes in the top. She smiled at the grimace on my face. ?Keep it in the refrigerator or they turn into beetles.?

Lynn also suggested outings for Ernest in our back yard. ?He likes the fresh air,? she explained. I wondered how she could tell.

Only a mother desperate to help her shy child adjust to school would keep a turtle that?s been the preschool pet for twelve years. And this isn?t just any preschool. People put their babies on the wait list in utero for this one. These parents pay attention. So Ernest?s stay had to be perfect.

First I had to find a safe spot for his aquarium-style tank, away from our slobbering, curious Labrador Retriever. My choice: the kitchen counter. Yes, Ernest lived near my stove, and yes, turtles carry salmonella. Let?s just say if I can keep worms in my refrigerator, I can have a turtle on my countertop.

I congratulated myself for being such a great mom. (Look! I let my kids keep pets I can?t stand to touch!)

Two weekends later, my husband Brett helped Reed scrub the tank while Ernest took a stroll on the kitchen floor. I practiced my deep breathing exercises. The task done, Reed and his older brother Ryan gave Ernest his first backyard airing.

While Ernest?s tank dried in the sun, he lumbered through the flower garden, neck outstretched, enjoying the fresh air. Ryan and Reed kept an eye on him. But since he moved at -- well, a turtle?s pace -- they checked on him in between slides down the hill. I planted some perennials. Rachel, our teenage daughter, lay tanning on the deck. Life was good.

Good until Ryan hollered, ?Where?s Ernest??

?What do you mean, ?Where?s Ernest???

?I can?t find him, Mom. He was here just a minute ago.?

Choking back vomit, I ran to the flower bed where Ernest had been. No turtle. Get a grip, I thought.

?Well, he can?t be far.? I barked orders to all three kids. ?Rachel, establish a perimeter; Ryan, check the inside of the dog?s mouth?? We scrambled through flower beds, peered under bushes, combed the hillside. Even the dog sniffed around.

An hour later, still no trace. Turtles don?t leave footprints or make a sound. And Ernest?s coloring was the perfect camouflage for our wooded backyard.

?Rachel,? I begged my daughter, ?Call Petco. See if they sell box turtles.? She ran inside to make the call. Ryan and Reed pulled ivy. I made silent bargains with the Almighty.

?Mom,? Rachel called down to me from the deck. ?I called them. We can?t get one.?

?What do you mean, we can?t get one??

?They said it?s not legal to sell box turtles here, Mom!?

There I stood, knee deep in plants I had yanked in our frenzy to find little Speedo. I pictured myself lugging Ernest?s empty cage back into the classroom. I pictured wide-eyed children peering into that empty cage. I imagined Reed?s expression as the children pointed stubby fingers at him -- the turtle loser.

My husband came back from his run and saw us razing our freshly landscaped garden. ?What?s going on?? he asked.

Gesturing with dirty hands in a pose reminiscent of Edvard Munch?s The Scream, I wailed, ?We lost the pre-school turtle!?

Brett?s expression told me it was time to call the teacher.

?My first concern is the kids,? Teacher Lynn began. ?This will be the first real loss for some of them. We?ll have to tell them the truth.? As she paused, I realized just how deep a pit of bile had collected in my stomach. She asked if Reed was worried and suggested I emphasize the fun Ernest might be having on his adventure. ?But the little guy has done this before: one summer, he was gone for three months and turned up in a neighbor?s yard,? she continued. Now you tell me, I thought. ?You may find him yet,? Lynn reassured. I hung up, feeling ill. I had to do something.

I called Reptile World, described our hilly area and asked if a turtle could survive there. ?He?ll have nutrition and hydration. He might winter over just fine there,? the reptile expert told me. Winter over? The return to preschool was less than two months away.

We printed up flyers: Lost Box Turtle. Answers to the name of Ernest. Size of a teacup saucer. Reward! Many neighbors, some I?d never met, fought smiles when we knocked on their doors, brandishing the flyer.

?I?m really worried,? I said to Brett later that night. ?Could we rent some heat-seeking infrared binoculars to help us find him in all the brush??

Brett bit his lip. ?Sue, honey, Ernest is cold blooded.?

The summer passed. The first few weeks, Reed and Ryan filled Ernest?s food dish daily with strawberries, worms, and grapes and set out small water dishes around the yard. But gradually, their daily backyard searches gave way to twice-weekly searches.

If I talked about Ernest, Reed murmured happily, ?He?s in the backyard on an adventure, Mommy. Now I get to keep him for always!?

Soon it was September, time for the back to school open house. Filled with dread, I sneaked in and stood by the coffee, trying to hide my scarlet E. Lynn took me aside. ?Two boys asked where Ernest was. Before I could answer, one of them remembered that Reed took him home for the summer.?

I gulped, speechless. Lynn nodded. ?I?ll be letting the parents know a little later tonight. But I won?t tell which backyard he was in,? she winked. My coffee tasted like mud. I walked to the classroom meeting like a condemned woman.

I tuned out Teacher Lynn?s welcome back talk. But I sat bolt upright when she added, ?I have some other news. Ernest has gone missing. He was in a backyard and just wandered off.?

The room was as quiet as a turtle cage. My face grew hot. My scalp prickled. I realized I might as well spill the beans since a four year old had already figured out the truth.

?The backyard where Ernest wandered off,? I began in a small voice, ?was mine. We are the ones who lost him.? When I got to the part about the flyers we printed and the infrared binoculars, my voice trailed off.

There was a silence, then a chuckle. ?Let?s take Sue out for a glass of wine. She?s had a rough summer,? a couple of moms sympathized. Another mom blurted, ?I?m just so glad I didn?t volunteer to take him!? And then everyone in the room laughed out loud.

Want to read more thought-provoking essays? Subscribe to Brain, Child: The Magazine for Thinking Mothers and see why we?ve been receiving awards for literary excellence since 2000.

Earlier on HuffPost:

"; var coords = [-5, -72]; // display fb-bubble FloatingPrompt.embed(this, html, undefined, 'top', {fp_intersects:1, timeout_remove:2000,ignore_arrow: true, width:236, add_xy:coords, class_name: 'clear-overlay'}); });

Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/15/the-importance-of-keeping-ernest_n_3275666.html

Google Keep ncaa scores Splash Ncaa Basketball Tournament NCAA Bracket 2013 Robert Morris spring

Saturday, April 27, 2013

Study Links Roundup to Obesity, Cancer, and More | Care2 Healthy ...

A new study published in the peer-reviewed journal Entropy indicates that glyphosate?the main ingredient in Monsanto?s Roundup weed killer?may be linked to gastrointestinal disorders, obesity, diabetes, heart disease, depression, autism, infertility, cancer and Alzheimer?s disease.

The study showed that glyphosate inhibits the function of enzymes that are critical to enable the body to properly detoxify. Additionally, it also enhances the damaging effects of other foodborne chemical residues and environmental toxins.

According to the scientists who completed the study, ?The industry asserts (glyphosate) is minimally toxic to humans, but here we argue otherwise.? They indicate that residues of glyphosate are found in foods that people are eating on a regular basis, especially sugar, corn, soy and wheat.

The scientists behind this important study include: Anthony Samsel is a retired science consultant and member of the Union of Concerned Scientists and Stephanie Seneff who is a research scientist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. They add that ?Negative impact on the body is insidious and manifests slowly over time as inflammation damages cellular systems throughout the body.?

Pesticides have been found in many studies to be toxic to the brain and nervous system of humans.

There is no good reason to use glyphosate or other toxic chemicals on lawns, agriculture, or food.? Many of these chemicals used in creating ?picture-perfect? lawns or in agricultural use are seeping into groundwater and the residues find their way into our food supply.? The harm to living organisms appears to outweigh any alleged benefits concocted by corporate marketing departments.

Many scientists and environmentalists have been warning about the dangers of glyphosate to plants, animals and people for many years.

Monsanto is the developer of Roundup herbicide as well as the genetically-modified seeds that have been altered to withstand being sprayed by Roundup.

For more information about toxins linked to cancer, check out Cancer-Proof.

Related:
Apple Extract Shows Promise against Cancer
17 Essential Reasons to Eat Organic Food

Subscribe to my free e-magazine World?s Healthiest News to receive monthly health news, tips, recipes and more. Follow my blog on my site HealthySurvivalist.com, Twitter @mschoffrocook and Facebook.

Read more: Alzheimer's, Cancer, Colitis, Crohn's & IBS, Conscious Consumer, Diabetes, Diet & Nutrition, Eating for Health, Eco-friendly tips, Environment, General Health, Health & Safety, Heart & Vascular Disease, Lawns & Gardens, Michelle Schoffro Cook, Nature & Wildlife, News & Issues, Obesity, Smart Shopping, alzheimer's disease, autism, cancer, corn, depression, diabetes, Dr. Cook, gastrointestinal disorders, GI problems, glyphosate, heart disease, infertility, lose weight, Michelle Schoffro Cook, Monsanto, obesity, overweight, pesticides, roundup, soy, sugar, toxins, weed killer, wheat, World's Healthiest News

'; $("#Care2CommentContainer").prepend(newComment); } function loadCommentPage(page, numPerPage, itemID) { var sPath = '/greenliving/study-links-roundup-to-obesity-cancer-and-more.html'; var charForQueryString = (sPath.indexOf("?") != -1) ? "&" : "?"; var servlet = charForQueryString + 'Care2CommentPageAJAX=1&page='+page+'&commentsPerPage='+numPerPage+'&itemID='+itemID; var p = $('

Loading...

'); $("#Care2CommentPageLinkContainer").append(p); var curOffset = $(document).height() - $(document).scrollTop(); $.ajax({ "url" : sPath + servlet, "dataType" : "xml", "success" : function(data) { data = $(data); if($("value[key=comments]", data).length) { var data_comments = $("value[key=comments]", data).text(); data_comments = data_comments.replace('&', '&'); data_comments = data_comments.replace(' 1) { html +='

'; } $('#Care2CommentPageLinkContainer').html(html); } $(function() { reloadPaginationLinks(1, 9); }); function display_abuse_form(element) { document.getElementById("report-link-"+element).style.display='none'; document.getElementById("report-"+element).style.display='block'; } function cancel_abuse_form(element) { document.getElementById("report-link-"+element).style.display='block'; document.getElementById("report-"+element).style.display='none'; } function display_response_to_abuse_form(commentID, success) { document.getElementById('report-buttons-'+commentID).style.display = ""; document.getElementById('report-submitting-'+commentID).style.display = "none"; if(success) document.getElementById('report-'+commentID).style.display='none'; var d = (success) ? "success" : "failed"; document.getElementById('report-response-'+d+'-'+commentID).style.display=''; setTimeout(function(){blinkText.start(document.getElementById('report-response-'+d+'-'+commentID), false);}, 5000); } function report_abuse(itemID, commentID, msg) { document.getElementById('report-sbmtbtn-'+commentID).blur(); document.getElementById('report-buttons-'+commentID).style.display = "none"; document.getElementById('report-submitting-'+commentID).style.display = ""; blinkText.start(document.getElementById('report-submitting-'+commentID), true); var sPath = '/greenliving/study-links-roundup-to-obesity-cancer-and-more.html'; var charForQueryString = (sPath.indexOf("?") != -1) ? "&" : "?"; var servlet = charForQueryString+'itemID='+itemID+'&Care2ReportCommentAJAX=1&commentID='+commentID+'&abuse_msg='+escape(msg); $.ajax({ "url" : sPath + servlet, "dataType" : "xml", "success" : function(data) { data = $(data); if($("value[key=abuse_report]", data).length) { display_response_to_abuse_form(commentID, true); } else { display_response_to_abuse_form(commentID, false); } }, "error" : function(data) { display_response_to_abuse_form(commentID, false); } }); } var blinkText = { start: function(elmnt,bleenk,speed) { var _self = this; this.o = 100; this.u = 'down'; this.a = speed||4; this.d = elmnt; this.b = bleenk; this.changeOpacity(elmnt,this.o); this.intvl = setInterval(function() { if(_self.d.style.display == "none") clearInterval(_self.intvl); if(_self.u == "down"){ _self.o -= _self.a; if(_self.o 100) { _self.o = 100-_self.a; _self.u = "down"; } } _self.changeOpacity(_self.d,_self.o); }, 50); }, changeOpacity: function(d,o) { d.style.opacity = o/100; d.style.MozOpacity = o/100; d.style.KhtmlOpacity = o/100; d.style.filter = "alpha(opacity=" + o + ")"; } }

Source: http://www.care2.com/greenliving/study-links-roundup-to-obesity-cancer-and-more.html

bradley cooper channing tatum Jennifer Aniston naomi watts Oscar Nominations 2013 Beasts of the Southern Wild 2013 Oscars

Friday, April 26, 2013

Babies are conscious? Science confirms what moms know.

Babies are aware of what's going on, not just reflexively reacting to it, scientists concluded after a series of experiments on babies as young as 5 months.

By Stephanie Pappas,?Live Science / April 18, 2013

A contestant in the 2000 American Baby Derby heads towards the finish line. Crawling babies raced to see who was fastest. According to the promoters, The Boston Baby Faire, a two-day event with more than 200 exhibitors of every type of baby product, is the largest baby exposition in the United States.

John Nordell / The Christian Science Monitor

Enlarge

Infants have a conscious experience of the world at as early as 5 months of age, new research finds.

Skip to next paragraph

' + google_ads[0].line2 + '
' + google_ads[0].line3 + '

'; } else if (google_ads.length > 1) { ad_unit += ''; } } document.getElementById("ad_unit").innerHTML += ad_unit; google_adnum += google_ads.length; return; } var google_adnum = 0; google_ad_client = "pub-6743622525202572"; google_ad_output = 'js'; google_max_num_ads = '1'; google_feedback = "on"; google_ad_type = "text"; google_adtest = "on"; google_image_size = '230x105'; google_skip = '0'; // -->

New parents may raise an eyebrow at the idea that their baby might not be a conscious being, but scientists have, until now, not been able to clearly show that infants react with awareness rather than reflexively. Even in adults, much of the brain's processing of the world occurs without conscious awareness, said Sid Kouider, a neuroscientist at the Laboratoire de Sciences Cognitives et Psycholinguistique in Paris and the Technical University of Denmark. ?

One odd phenomenon, "blindsight," occurs in people with damage to part of their visual cortex. Although they cannot consciously see, they're able to "guess" the location of a visual stimulus or even catch objects tossed at them. Blindsight reveals that even unconscious processing in the brain can result in seemingly goal-directed behavior.

So when babies look toward a face or grasp an object, they, too, might be doing so without a conscious experience of what they're seeing.

"Infants might be responding in a kind of automatic manner," Kouider told LiveScience. Unfortunately, since babies don't talk, scientists can't test consciousness by asking infants what they experience.

Baby brain patterns

So Kouider and his colleagues turned to brain activity for a peak into babies' awareness. When adults are shown a subliminal image, their brains show a spike in electrical activity in sensory regions ? even though they may not consciously register that they've seen such a brief image.

When the image does consciously register, however, the brain shows a second leap in activity, typically about 300 milliseconds after the presentation of the image. This pattern reveals visual consciousness, Kouider said, which means that not only does the brain respond to the image, but also the owner of that brain perceives that response and has a conscious experience of the image.

The researchers wanted to know whether babies would show this same brain pattern. They recruited 30 5-month-olds, 29 12-month-olds and 21 15-month-olds and fitted the babies with electrode caps that measure the brain's electrical activity through the scalp.

Next, the babies sat on their mother or father's lap while watching a screen with a patterned image. For a fraction of a second (ranging from as quick as 17 milliseconds up to 300 milliseconds), the researchers flashed a photo of a face on the screen.

Experiencing awareness

The scientists then analyzed the babies' brain activity to search for the two-phase pattern that would indicate consciousness. They found it: Babies did indeed show a secondary spike in neural activity, just like adults.

But there was one important difference between the babies' neural patterns and those seen in adults, Kouider said. In 5-month-olds, it took 1.3 seconds for the second flurry of brain activity to show up. In adults, the timing is closer to three-tenths of a second, or 0.3 seconds.

"It's about four times slower, actually, in the younger infants," Kouider said.?

Older babies show snappier processing, though still not as quick as adults, the researchers found. In 12- to 15-month-olds, the second phase is stronger than in 5-month-olds and occurs around eight-tenths to nine-tenths of a second.

Source: http://rss.csmonitor.com/~r/feeds/science/~3/In93FUJa3Zc/Babies-are-conscious-Science-confirms-what-moms-know

hatchet leah messer freedom riders 9th circuit court of appeals gisele bundchen tom brady randy travis arrested dickens

Nets, harpoons could be used to haul in space junk

(AP) ? Nets, harpoons and suicide robots could become weapons of choice to hunt down the space junk threatening crucial communications satellites currently in orbit round Earth, scientists said Thursday.

Even lasers that act like "Star Trek" tractor beams were among the proposals put forward to protect some $100 billion worth of satellites from man-made cosmic garbage.

"Whatever we do is going to be an expensive solution," Heiner Klinkrad, a space debris expert at the European Space Agency, said at the end of an international conference on space debris in Darmstadt, Germany. "But one has to compare the costs of what we are investing to solve the problem as compared to losing the infrastructure that we have in orbit."

Experts estimate that about 27,000 objects measuring 10 centimeters (4 inches) or more are flying through orbit at 80 times the speed of a passenger jet, Klinkrad said. Each one of those could destroy a satellite. And even vastly smaller debris of just 1 millimeter ? of which there are about 160 million ? can render sensitive space instruments useless.

Thomas Schildknecht, an astronomer at the University of Bern, Switzerland, said it would be technically feasible to send a satellite into space to capture objects with a net and harpoon.

But more elaborate proposals could also work, Schildknecht said. These include a satellite firing electrically charged atoms ? or ions ? at an object to gradually slow it down and thereby drag it back to Earth.

Ground-based lasers could be used in the same way, though only for very small objects, he said.

For larger objects like ESA's 18,000-pound (8,100-kilogram) Envisat, which broke down last year, a dedicated robot could be built which would be sent on a suicide mission to bring the satellite down safely. Such missions could cost up to $200 million each.

"I'm confident that we will see demonstration missions in the near future," said Schildknecht.

ESA says testing of new technologies for cleaning up space needs to start soon because the amount of junk spinning uncontrollably through orbit is growing.

Concerns about the risk of space junk increased in 2007, when China's military shot down one of the country's defunct weather satellites in a show of force, inadvertently spraying orbit with thousands of pieces of debris.

Klinkrad said 5-10 large objects need to be collected each year to prevent what is known as the Kessler Syndrome ? when a few major collisions trigger a cascade effect in which each crash vastly increases the amount of dangerous debris in orbit.

So far, major collisions have been rare. In 2009, a private communications satellite called Iridium 33 smashed into the Russian military satellite Kosmos-2251, destroying both in the process. Scientists say it's only a matter of time before the next one occurs, and smaller debris may pose the biggest danger because they are harder to track.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/b2f0ca3a594644ee9e50a8ec4ce2d6de/Article_2013-04-25-EU-Germany-Space-Junk/id-4704b578e2164495bdc8ef42dba36dd0

foo fighters nikki minaj album of the year grammy red carpet grammy award winners the band perry grammy awards

EPA: We Should Probably Get Rid of That 2.6 Billion Pounds of Toxic Waste in Our Drinking Water

A lot has changed in 30 years, but one thing has stayed the same: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has allowed power plants to dump just as many toxic pollutants in the nation?s waterways as they did in 1982.

Well, until now, that is.

The EPA announced late last week that it would be updating its pollution guidelines for steam electric power plants for the first time in 30 years, a move that will reduce pollutants like mercury, arsenic, lead, and selenium in American lakes and rivers by as much as 2.6 billion pounds.

When the regulations proposed by the EPA are finalized, they will affect the nation?s 1,200 steam electric power plants that generate electricity using nuclear fuel or fossil fuels like coal, oil, and natural gas.

?America?s waterways are vital to the health and well-being of our communities,? acting EPA administrator Bob Perciasepe wrote in a press release. ?Reducing the pollution of our waters through effective but flexible controls such as we are proposing today is a win-win for our public health and our economic vitality.?

?

?

?

Waste discharged from power plants accounts for more than half of all toxic pollutants released into American waterways, damaging 23,000 miles of rivers and streams. And this ?effluent? is not benign.

High levels of exposure to pollutants like lead, mercury, and arsenic have been linked to neurological damage and cancer as well as damage to the circulatory system, kidneys, and liver, according to the EPA. Toxic heavy metals have also been known to cause harm to aquatic wildlife, including massive fish deaths.

In 2010, a coalition of environmental organizations, including Earthjustice and Clean Water Action, sued the EPA to address the outdated regulations. That same coalition applauded the EPA?s initial proposal to reduce pollutants, which included five regulatory options that use ?affordable, available? technologies to clean up toxic wastewater coming from power plants.

But the groups maintained that only two of the five regulatory would successfully prevent toxic water. The other options would allow industry to continue to dump pollutants into ?unlined pits,? or would regulate just one of the two kinds of ash released when coal is burned in boilers that generate steam to generate power.?

?We would like to see the strongest iteration of the rules as possible to make sure that the least amount of pollutants enter our waterways,? says Sandra Diaz, North Carolina campaign coordinator for Appalachian Voices, a regional environmental organization that is part of the coalition of groups advocating for regulatory changes. ?A recent EPA report found that 50 percent of our waterways are impaired for various reasons, and the EPA has estimated that 50 percent of that is due to power plant pollution. This is the largest single factor in terms of water pollution in the country.?

Diaz says communities in her home state of North Carolina have felt the impacts of power plant pollution.?

A recent study conducted by Duke University researchers found high levels of arsenic in North Carolina bodies of water located downstream from coal-fired power plants.

In Mountain Island Lake, which supplies drinking water for the city of Charlotte, the Duke team identified samples from lake sediment that contained up to 250 parts per billion of arsenic, which is 25 times higher than current EPA standards for safe drinking water.??

?In extreme drought conditions that arsenic from the lake sediment could uptake into the water column, and could create a huge spike in arsenic in the drinking water supply for much of the Charlotte area,? Diaz tells TakePart. ?This has frightening implications for folks who are drinking the water or swimming in it. We can stop that by issuing some strong rules.?

The EPA will likely publish these the draft rules in the federal register in the next few weeks. Once they are published, the clock will start on a 60-day comment period, during which the public can weigh in about the proposed regulations through regulations.gov or the Appalachian Voices website, before the EPA takes final action. ?

Any new regulatory requirements for power plants would be phased in between 2017 and 2022.

Related Stories on TakePart:

? Stunning Photos: China's Yantze River Mysteriously Turns Bright Red

? Millions of Fish-Killing Plastic Pellets Wash Up on Hong Kong Beaches

? Raw Sewage: The Next Environmental Catastrophe?


Alison Fairbrother is the director of the nonpartisan Public Trust Project, which investigates and reports on misrepresentations of science by corporations and government. She has written for the Washington Monthly, the Washington Spectator, Grist, and Politics Daily, among others. Alison is based in Washington, D.C. @adfairbrother | TakePart.com

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/epa-probably-rid-2-6-billion-pounds-toxic-175322116.html

prince jessica biel Lena Dunham elton john janelle monae weather nyc national signing day

SKorea warns of 'grave measure' if NKorea rejects talks

SEOUL, South Korea (AP) ? South Korea on Thursday warned of an unspecified "grave measure" if North Korea rejects a call for talks on a jointly run factory park that has been closed for nearly a month.

In a televised briefing with reporters, Unification Ministry spokesman Kim Hyung-suk refused to describe what Seoul would do if Pyongyang doesn't respond by a deadline Friday to a demand for formal working-level talks on the industrial complex just over the heavily armed border in the North Korean town of Kaesong.

But Seoul may be signaling it will pull out its remaining workers from the factory across the border in Kaesong. That could lead to the end of a complex considered the last remaining symbol of inter-Korean cooperation.

As animosity rose between the Koreas early this month, North Korea barred South Koreans from crossing the border and entering the factory. It later suspended operations and withdrew the 53,000 North Korean workers who manned assembly lines there. Pyongyang hasn't forced South Koreans to leave and about 175 are still there.

The factory has operated with South Korean know-how and technology and cheap labor from North Korea since 2004. It is a hold-over from an era that saw the Koreas try to cooperate through various projects.

For several weeks, until recently, North Korea issued a steady stream of criticism and threats aimed at Seoul and Washington, expressing anger over ongoing U.S.-South Korean military drills that the North calls invasion preparations and U.N. sanctions over its February nuclear test. Pyongyang has recently eased its rhetoric, but tensions between the rivals are still high.

As Some South Korean businesses have been quietly mulling giving up on Kaesong altogether.

"Our people are suffering serious difficulties due to the shortage of food and medicines and our companies are suffering big damages and pains," Kim said.

To resolve deadlocked operations at Kaesong, Kim said North Korea should first allow some South Koreans to cross the border to hand over food and medicine to the remaining managers at Kaesong.

South Korea on Wednesday proposed talks between the head of a South Korean management office at Kaesong and the North's General Bureau for Central Guidance to the Development of the Special Zone, but the North rebuffed the offer, Kim said.

"It's very regrettable for North Korea to reject (taking) the minimum humanitarian measures for our workers at the Kaesong industrial complex," he said.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/skorea-demands-talks-nkorea-closed-factory-013622996--finance.html

augusta national blake griffin pau gasol marlins park marbury v. madison 2013 lincoln mkz burger king mary j blige